HCMSG - Hepatitis C Mentor & Support Group, Inc.

  • Home
  • OUR SERVICES
    • The Circle Model >
      • Circle Model Data Form
    • RESOURCES
    • HepCTraining >
      • Live Training
    • Order Materials
    • Webinars
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Medical Advisors
    • Support Us
    • Contact Us
  • Home
  • OUR SERVICES
    • The Circle Model >
      • Circle Model Data Form
    • RESOURCES
    • HepCTraining >
      • Live Training
    • Order Materials
    • Webinars
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Medical Advisors
    • Support Us
    • Contact Us

Why Forced Addiction Treatment Fails

5/1/2022

0 Comments

 
April 30, 2022  NY TIMES OPINION
By Maia Szalavitz-Ms. Szalavitz is a contributing Opinion writer. She covers addiction and public policy.
​
Jason Norelli, a San Francisco native, spent several years homeless in and around the city’s Tenderloin district, addicted to methamphetamine. In 2001, he was legally mandated to attend rehab and has been in recovery ever since. Today he helps others like him get care.
Mr. Norelli’s experience makes him seem like a poster child for legally mandated addiction treatment. At least 37 states now have laws on the books that allow parents, police or concerned others to petition courts to compel rehab through civil commitment if a judge deems someone a threat to themselves or others.

Twenty-five such laws were passed or expanded between 2015 and 2018 alone, according to a recent investigation by The Intercept, and this growth continues. This month, Massachusetts proposed an increase in funding to its civil commitment program for addiction, bringing it to about $23 million. In March, Gov. Gavin Newsom of California proposed a new system of “CARE Courts,” to expand civil commitment for homeless people with schizophrenia and often addiction.

But voluntary rehab has a better track record and is less likely to harm the people it is intended to help. Criminalization and coercion have helped create a patchwork of addiction programs that is harsh, low quality, underfunded, understaffed and too often fraudulent. Since legally mandated care is often the only way to get immediate and free treatment, a damaging cycle continues.

  • Give this article


ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story
OPINIONGUEST ESSAY
Why Forced Addiction Treatment Fails
April 30, 2022
Credit...Julianna Brion
  • Give this article




By Maia Szalavitz
Ms. Szalavitz is a contributing Opinion writer. She covers addiction and public policy.
Jason Norelli, a San Francisco native, spent several years homeless in and around the city’s Tenderloin district, addicted to methamphetamine. In 2001, he was legally mandated to attend rehab and has been in recovery ever since. Today he helps others like him get care.
Mr. Norelli’s experience makes him seem like a poster child for legally mandated addiction treatment. At least 37 states now have laws on the books that allow parents, police or concerned others to petition courts to compel rehab through civil commitment if a judge deems someone a threat to themselves or others.
Twenty-five such laws were passed or expanded between 2015 and 2018 alone, according to a recent investigation by The Intercept, and this growth continues. This month, Massachusetts proposed an increase in funding to its civil commitment program for addiction, bringing it to about $23 million. In March, Gov. Gavin Newsom of California proposed a new system of “CARE Courts,” to expand civil commitment for homeless people with schizophrenia and often addiction.
But voluntary rehab has a better track record and is less likely to harm the people it is intended to help. Criminalization and coercion have helped create a patchwork of addiction programs that is harsh, low quality, underfunded, understaffed and too often fraudulent. Since legally mandated care is often the only way to get immediate and free treatment, a damaging cycle continues.
To do better, the United States needs more evidence-based treatment. And since the data shows that the best treatment is compassionate and inviting, coercion should be the last resort, not the first.

Mr. Norelli opposes compulsory drug treatment. He feels that being forced into treatment can push people in the other direction if they are not ready to quit. “Of the hundred people that came in at the same time I did, only a few completed it,” he said, adding that he is still disturbed by the “humiliating” way they were treated.

TO CONTINUE READING: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/30/opinion/forced-addiction-treatment.html?


0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    July 2025
    June 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Privacy Policy
Disclaimer:  Information given by Hepatitis C Mentor and Support Group is not a substitute for advice given by your physician or health care provider.  We do not endorse any doctor, hospital, medical group, or treatment.