|
JAMA Published Online: March 25, 2026 Sanjay Kishore, MD1; Margaret Hayden, MD, MPhil1; Micah Johnson, MD2 Since initially becoming available in 2013, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have transformed the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Treatment is well tolerated and results in cure (sustained virologic response) in more than 95% of individuals. However, only about a third of people in the US with HCV infection receive treatment within a year of diagnosis, an estimated 2.5 million to 4 million remain chronically infected, and incident cases of HCV have increased during the last decade.1,2 To better understand how the use of DAAs has evolved in the US, this study measured changes in patient and prescriber characteristics for these medications from 2013 to 2025.
TO READ FULL ARTICLE:https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2846850
0 Comments
Scripps Research scientists reengineer critical proteins on the surface of HCV, paving the way for a new vaccine design. March 03, 2026
LA JOLLA, CA--Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects an estimated 50 million people worldwide, according to the World Health Organization, and remains a leading cause of cirrhosis and liver cancer. While antiviral drugs can cure most infections, global access remains limited and these drugs do not stop reinfection. This is why a durable vaccine is critically needed. Developing one has proven exceptionally challenging, however, as HCV evades immune detection using two distinct proteins that coat its surface. These proteins, known collectively as the E1E2 glycoprotein complex, have been historically difficult to produce in the stable, native form needed for vaccination. In a new Nature Communications study, scientists at Scripps Research have now engineered that native-like, stabilized version of HCV’s E1E2 complex and used it to build a nanoparticle-based vaccine candidate. The approach uses a technology called self-assembling protein nanoparticles, or SApNPs, which organizes many copies of the proteins into virus-like clusters that the immune system can more easily recognize. The study was published as an article-in-press on February 11, 2026. “Our lab focuses on all the major virus families, including those with surface proteins that are too unstable to use in traditional vaccines,” says senior author Jiang Zhu, professor at Scripps Research. “For HCV, the central problem for decades has been that the two surface proteins, E1 and E2, fall apart or misassemble when removed from the virus. In this study, we were able to stabilize the native E1–E2 interface and generate a soluble complex that faithfully mimics the viral surface.” On HCV’s viral surface, E1 and E2 form tightly linked pairs known as heterodimers. Together, they both shield the virus from immune attack and allow it to attach to and enter human cells. Because vaccines train the immune system to recognize viral proteins, scientists must first recreate accurate copies of them in the lab. However, the E1 and E2 glycoproteins are notoriously difficult and labor-intensive to manufacture: once removed from the virus, they often misfold or fall apart. For more than two decades, scientists been attempting to produce this stable, soluble E1E2 complex that preserves the correct interface between the two proteins. Without it, vaccines cannot teach the body’s immune system to recognize HCV’s true viral structure. It’s remained a major unsolved challenge in the HCV field at large. TO CONTINUE: https://www.scripps.edu/news-and-events/press-room/2026/20260303-zhu-nanoparticle-vaccine.html Voices from the frontline: how global funding cuts are reshaping the viral hepatitis response2/24/2026 Marion Delphina [email protected] ∙ Monica Fambroughb ∙ Jana Manningb ∙ Lindsey Hiebert-Suwondob ∙ Jessica Hicksc ∙ Philippa C Matthewsa,d,e
February 18, 2026 , The Lancet, Gastroenterology & Hepatology Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are among the world's leading infectious threats, together responsible for over a million deaths each year, but these infections remain neglected by global funding.1,2 In 2025, the US Government revised its global health priorities and substantially reduced foreign aid commitments,3–5 including cuts to the US Agency for International Development and the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, with estimated reductions totalling around US$60 billion.6,7 HIV infrastructure, built and maintained with this funding, has long provided resources that also support interventions for HBV and HCV, including harm reduction, screening, prophylaxis, treatment, clinic space, and staffing. Against this backdrop, reductions in global health funding risk destabilising these interconnected systems, with consequences for HBV and HCV elimination efforts worldwide. To explore the early real-world consequences of funding reductions on hepatitis elimination efforts, the Coalition for Global Hepatitis Elimination (CGHE), the World Hepatitis Alliance (WHA), and the Hepatitis Elimination Lab (Plan-B) team issued online surveys to researchers, health-care workers, public health practitioners, civil societies, community-based organisations, people living with HBV or HCV, and government and ministry of health representatives, including national hepatitis programme managers (appendix pp 2–30).8 Surveys were shared from March to October, 2025, through social media, emails, and conference presentations. Responses could be submitted anonymously. These surveys gathered quantitative and qualitative input from 240 individuals and groups working internationally in hepatitis awareness, patient support, vaccination, testing, care, treatment, and research, allowing them to describe how changes in the global funding landscape have impacted their lives and work. In the Plan-B survey, 31% of respondents reported high impact and 37% possible impact of the funding cuts on clinical care, and 40% of respondents reported high impact and 40% possible impact on research. In responses to the CGHE survey, 40% of organisations and 62% of programme managers reported being affected, and half of respondents to the WHA survey indicated that hepatitis services in their country had already been impacted. The reasons for these disruptions were broadly consistent: participants cited the collapse of the HIV service framework that previously supported viral hepatitis programmes, the direct loss of research funding, and remaining funds being redirected to other health priorities. Respondents highlighted severe staffing losses—among both clinical teams and ministry of health and public health personnel—which led to clinic closures and, alongside the withdrawal of US National Institutes of Health-funded grants, the cancellation of ongoing research studies. TO CONTINUE: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(26)00014-2/fulltext February 3, 2026 by Amy Lieberman-The Network For Public Health Law Historically, there has been no way for people to know what, exactly, is in drugs bought outside of pharmacies. This lack of knowledge leads to increased risk of overdose and other negative outcomes. Contaminants including fentanyl are now present in the illicit drug supply throughout the United States, driving a more than 750 percent increase from 2015 to 2023 in non-methadone synthetic opioid-related overdose deaths. Other adulterants such as xylazine and medetomidine have also appeared in many areas of the country. Helping people determine what is in the drugs they intend to consume, often called “drug checking,” can be an impactful harm reduction intervention.
Drug checking research has shown that people often change their drug use when provided with information about what is in their drugs. Test strips, reagent tests, and more advanced equipment like FTIR machines or mass spectrometers are all used in comprehensive drug checking programs. While these methods vary in both comprehensiveness and expense, all provide information to a person about what is in the drugs they are considering using. State drug paraphernalia laws can limit access to drug checking initiatives by prohibiting possessing or distributing anything used for “testing” or “analyzing” drugs. Over the last few years, many states have modified these laws to remove barriers to some or all drug checking equipment. However, these laws typically only permit possession of the equipment used to perform drug checking, and do not explicitly provide protection from arrest and prosecution for possession of the drugs to be tested. Without these protections, the impact of drug checking on communities will not reach its full potential. As of January 2026, only three states--California, Vermont, and Massachusetts—have passed laws that permit both providers and clients to possess drugs to be checked, while Washington and Oregon provide protections for providers only. California’s law is currently the most comprehensive of these laws. It permits the possession of injection or smoking equipment when obtaining drug checking services and provides a broad set of protections for staff of the drug checking program. Participants engaged in obtaining drug checking services are also immune from detention, arrest, prosecution, violation of parole, probation, or any form of community supervision, civil, disciplinary, or administrative action, forfeiture of property, or referral to ICE for possession of drugs. Further, the law forbids the collection of a participant’s personal information except when a provider is using the information to share results, after which it must be destroyed immediately and may not be shared with law enforcement. TO CONTINUE: //www.networkforphl.org/news-insights/state-laws-in-support-of-drug-checking-programs-can-help-reduce-overdose/?emci=48b19610- Drug checking services have been shown to reduce the risk of overdose by providing people with information on what is in drugs bought outside of pharmacies. Many state drug paraphernalia laws have been changed to increase access to drug checking equipment but are still silent on the use of that equipment. Changing state law to explicitly authorize comprehensive drug checking services could allow this important public health intervention to make a greater impact in reducing overdose death and drug-related harm. Drug checking Drug checking services have been shown to reduce the risk of overdose by providing people with information on what is in drugs bought outside of pharmacies. Many state drug paraphernalia laws have been changed to increase access to drug checking equipment but are still silent on the use of that equipment. Changing state law to explicitly authorize comprehensive drug checking services could allow this important public health intervention to make a greater impact in reducing overdose death and drug-related harm. ces have been shown to reduce the risk of overdose by providing people with information on what is in drugs bought outside of pharmacies. Many state drug paraphernalia laws have been changed to increase access to drug checking equipment but are still silent on the use of that equipment. Changing state law to explicitly authorize comprehensive drug checking services could allow this important public health intervention to make a greater impact in reducing overdose death and drug-related harm. Drug injection fades as smoking grows more common, marking sea change in U.S. fentanyl epidemic2/12/2026 Harm reduction experts applaud shift as safer, even as some officials reject pipe use
By Lev Facher, Feb. 12, 2026, STAT -Addiction ReporterROCHESTER, N.H. — Megan Merrill paused, mid-hike, as she surveyed the steep drop before her. She was standing on a five-foot snow drift, icy and brittle after 10 days of unrelenting New England cold, below which lay the railroad tracks that serve as a de facto border between the town behind her and the homeless encampment in front. She took the downward slope at a gallop, using her oversized backpack as a counterweight. The bag was made heavy with a stockpile of harm reduction supplies meant to help vulnerable drug users stay healthy and avoid disease, including sterile syringes, condoms, emergency blankets, and hand warmers. The items Merrill was most eager to distribute, however, were glass pipes. Her reasoning was simple: Injection can lead to infections, diseases, skin abscesses, and potentially higher rates of fatal overdose. To Merrill and harm reduction workers like her, pipes are health care. “You’re going to see less vein damage, you’re not going to get abscesses on your arm or infections,” said Merrill, who works with a local community organization, SOS Recovery. “There’s less chance of you overdosing if you’re smoking than if you’re injecting. And infectious diseases: With injections, there are blood-borne illnesses, hepatitis C, HIV.” In the last decade, U.S. drug consumption behavior has shifted rapidly away from injecting and toward smoking. Once largely limited to the West Coast, a preference for smoking opioids has spread east since the Covid-19 pandemic, becoming especially pronounced in hard-hit cities like Philadelphia. TO CONTINUE READING: https://www.statnews.com/2026/02/12/fentanyl-harm-reduction-smoking-not-injecting/?utm_campaign=rss Published January 30, 2026 | Originally published on MedicalXpress Breaking News-and-Events People with compromised liver function may be able to reduce their risk of liver cancer or slow its progression with a simple dietary change: eating less protein. A Rutgers-led study in Science Advances has found that low-protein diets slowed liver tumor growth and cancer death in mice, uncovering a mechanism by which a liver's impaired waste-handling machinery can inadvertently fuel cancer. Liver cancer remains one of the deadliest primary cancers in the United States, with a five-year survival rate of about 22%. The American Cancer Society estimates there were 42,240 new cases in 2025 and 30,090 deaths. The number of U.S. residents with compromised liver function who face elevated cancer risk is far larger. About one in four U.S. adults has fatty liver disease, a condition that—along with viral hepatitis and heavy alcohol use—can raise the risk of cirrhosis as well as cancer. TO CONTINUE READING: https://www.mdlinx.com/news/simple-dietary-change-may-slow-liver-cancer-in-at-risk-patients/5vt4nuXuSICYOz3hGsAbwv?utm_campaign=reg_daily-alert_20260204_daily-nl-am-v4_registered-users-a180_all&utm_source=iterable&utm_medium=email&utm_content=MorningDaily People with compromised liver function may be able to reduce their risk of liver cancer or slow its progression with a simple dietary change: eating less protein. A Rutgers-led study in Science Advances has found that low-protein diets slowed liver tumor growth and cancer death in mice, uncovering a mechanism by which a liver's impaired waste-handling machinery can inadvertently fuel cancer. Liver cancer remains one of the deadliest primary cancers in the United States, with a five-year survival rate of about 22%. The American Cancer Society estimates there were 42,240 new cases in 2025 and 30,090 deaths. The number of U.S. residents with compromised liver function who face elevated cancer risk is far larger. About one in four U.S. adults has fatty liver disease, a condition that—along with viral hepatitis and heavy alcohol use—can raise the risk of cirrhosis as well as cancer. People with compromised liver function may be able to reduce their risk of liver cancer or slow its progression with a simple dietary change: eating less protein. A Rutgers-led study in Science Advances has found that low-protein diets slowed liver tumor growth and cancer death in mice, uncovering a mechanism by which a liver's impaired waste-handling machinery can inadvertently fuel cancer. Liver cancer remains one of the deadliest primary cancers in the United States, with a five-year survival rate of about 22%. The American Cancer Society estimates there were 42,240 new cases in 2025 and 30,090 deaths. The number of U.S. residents with compromised liver function who face elevated cancer risk is far larger. About one in four U.S. adults has fatty liver disease, a condition that—along with viral hepatitis and heavy alcohol use—can raise the risk of cirrhosis as well as cancer. People with compromised liver function may be able to reduce their risk of liver cancer or slow its progression with a simple dietary change: eating less protein. A Rutgers-led study in Science Advances has found that low-protein diets slowed liver tumor growth and cancer death in mice, uncovering a mechanism by which a liver's impaired waste-handling machinery can inadvertently fuel cancer. Liver cancer remains one of the deadliest primary cancers in the United States, with a five-year survival rate of about 22%. The American Cancer Society estimates there were 42,240 new cases in 2025 and 30,090 deaths. The number of U.S. residents with compromised liver function who face elevated cancer risk is far larger. About one in four U.S. adults has fatty liver disease, a condition that—along with viral hepatitis and heavy alcohol use—can raise the risk of cirrhosis as well as cancer. People with compromised liver function may be able to reduce their risk of liver cancer or slow its progression with a simple dietary change: eating less protein. A Rutgers-led study in Science Advances has found that low-protein diets slowed liver tumor growth and cancer death in mice, uncovering a mechanism by which a liver's impaired waste-handling machinery can inadvertently fuel cancer. Liver cancer remains one of the deadliest primary cancers in the United States, with a five-year survival rate of about 22%. The American Cancer Society estimates there were 42,240 new cases in 2025 and 30,090 deaths. The number of U.S. residents with compromised liver function who face elevated cancer risk is far larger. About one in four U.S. adults has fatty liver disease, a condition that—along with viral hepatitis and heavy alcohol use—can raise the risk of cirrhosis as well as cancer. TO CONTINUE: https://www.mdlinx.com/news/simple-dietary-change-may-slow-liver-cancer-in-at-risk-patients/5vt4nuXuSICYOz3hGsAbwv?utm_campaign=reg_daily-alert_20260204_daily-nl-am-v4_registered-users-a180_all&utm_source=iterable&utm_medium=email&utm_content=MorningDaily Published December 10, 2025 | Originally published on MedicalXpress Breaking News-and-Events
MDLinx Scientists at Northwestern University have developed the fastest test yet for diagnosing hepatitis C virus (HCV). The highly accurate diagnostic delivers results to patients in just 15 minutes—up to 75% faster than other rapid HCV tests. This speed is crucial for kickstarting patients' treatment before they leave their appointment, potentially preventing painful, expensive complications and even death. The research behind the new test was published in The Journal of Infectious Diseases in a paper titled "Development of a Rapid Automated Point-of-Care Test for Hepatitis C Viral RNA on the DASH(r) Rapid PCR System." HCV can lead to a chronic hepatitis C infection, which affects an estimated 50 million people globally and causes approximately 242,000 deaths annually, largely due to resulting cirrhosis and liver cancer. While the infection is curable with an eight to 12-week course of medication, treatment rates remain low partially due to lack of affordable and easily accessible diagnostic tests. "We were able to develop a diagnostic test that can be performed at the point of care during a patient's clinical visit, which could enable same-day diagnosis and treatment in support of HCV elimination efforts," said Sally McFall, co-director of the Center for Innovation in Global Health Technologies (CIGHT) at Northwestern University McCormick School of Engineering, who developed the test. The test has demonstrated excellent analytical and clinical performance, McFall said. It also could play a critical role in the World Health Organization's ambitious goal to eliminate HCV by 2030. TO CONTINUE: https://www.mdlinx.com/news/new-15-minute-hepatitis-c-test-paves-the-way-for-same-day-treatment/K7bxNFfoVZnMDQbaptOfy?show_order=5&utm_campaign=reg_evening-edition_20260111_daily-nl-pm-v4_registered-users-a180-alls&utm_source=iterable&utm_medium=email By MDLinx staff Published December 11, 2025
Industry Buzz Cirrhosis is a catabolic state, so patients are losing their muscle mass, and if they cut protein, they are further exaggerating loss of bone mineral density, putting them at risk for fractures--Ashwani K. Singal, MD, MS The American College of Gastroenterology has issued its first stand-alone guideline on nutrition in patients with liver disease. [1]It's a long-overdue move, according to lead author Ashwani K. Singal, MD, MS, a transplant hepatologist at the University of Louisville. [2In a conversation with Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News, Dr. Singal laid out how clinicians should approach nutrition for patients with liver disease. [2] The message is clear: Stop restricting protein. Breaking the protein myth For decades, patients with cirrhosis have been told to cut back on protein to avoid worsening encephalopathy. The new guideline directly confronts this misconception. [3] Breaking the protein myth For decades, patients with cirrhosis have been told to cut back on protein to avoid worsening encephalopathy. The new guideline directly confronts this misconception. [3] "Cirrhosis is a catabolic state, so patients are losing their muscle mass, and if they cut protein, they are further exaggerating loss of bone mineral density, putting them at risk for fractures," Dr. Singal said. "In addition, muscle plays a big role in the elimination of ammonia. There’s a connection between nutritional state, muscle loss, and hepatic encephalopathy, as well as falls and fractures. This cycle can be broken by improving the patient’s nutritional status, by improving how they eat, how much they eat, and their protein intake." [2] TO CONTINUE: https://www.mdlinx.com/article/new-guideline-from-american-college-of-gastroenterology-spotlights-a-common-diet-myth/7lHVWBJP730pF2hFRSOf Measuring HCV viral load at 4 weeks posttreatment predicts a cure as well as sustained virological response at 12 weeks.
November 11, 2025 • By Liz Highleyman, POZ Achieving a sustained virological response four weeks after completing hepatitis C treatment—known as SVR4—is highly predictive of a cure, according to study results presented at the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) Liver Meeting. Confirming a cure earlier could be a practical approach for people who are at risk for loss to follow-up and could help determine sooner who might need another course of treatment. Direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C is highly effective, and more than 95% of people who complete treatment are cured. Successful treatment is defined as sustained virological response (SVR), or continued undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA. In the interferon era, sustained response was traditionally assessed at 24 weeks posttreatment (SVR24). But relapse that long after treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) is rare, so today a cure is typically assessed at 12 weeks (SVR12). Patients who still have detectable HCV RNA after treatment may have not responded adequately, may have relapsed or may have become reinfected. TO CONTINUE: https://www.poz.com/article/hepatitis-c-cure-can-assessed-4-weeks-treatment By MDLinx staff - Published August 5, 2025
Liver cancer rates are projected to nearly double by 2050, according to a new editorial in The Lancet, published last week.[1] In a recent Instagram Reel, gastroenterologist Supriya Rao, MD, discussed implications of the staggering statistic, what's driving the increase, and what doctors can do about it. Most cases are preventable. As a gastroenterologist, I see how it happens. —Gastroenterologist Supriya Rao, MD, @gutsygirl Behind the upward trend While startling, the trend is reversible, per the report—and Dr. Rao. “Most cases are preventable,” she said. “As a gastroenterologist, I see how it happens.” According to Dr. Rao, there are four major culprits fueling the rise in liver cancer: metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and obesity; alcohol-related liver disease; hepatitis B and C; and poor diet (high in ultra-processed foods and added sugars, which accelerate fatty liver progression). These risk factors often go undetected until irreversible liver damage has already occurred. TO CONTINUE:Liver cancer cases will double by 2050—here’s how docs can stop it | MDLinx |
Archives
March 2026
Categories |
RSS Feed